"The inconvenient truth is that the earth's temperatures have flat-lined since 2001, despite growing concentrations of C02."

Wondering why Obama and Pelosi want to ram this cap-and-trade bill through congress without a proper debate? The world is turning against this farce from scientists, to Australians to Vaclav Klaus of the Czech Republic. THERE JUST IS NO EVIDENCE FOR Gore's mantra of man made global warming!!!!!! It's all about power and money - plain and simple. I just hope we the people are not simple minded - write to your reps and demand a NO vote on this hideous obscenity of a bill.

...Among the many reasons President Barack Obama and the Democratic majority are so intent on quickly jamming a cap-and-trade system through Congress is because the global warming tide is again shifting. It turns out Al Gore and the United Nations (with an assist from the media), did a little too vociferous a job smearing anyone who disagreed with them as "deniers." The backlash has brought the scientific debate roaring back to life in Australia, Europe, Japan and even, if less reported, the U.S.

In April, the Polish Academy of Sciences published a document challenging man-made global warming. In the Czech Republic, where President Vaclav Klaus remains a leading skeptic, today only 11% of the population believes humans play a role. In France, President Nicolas Sarkozy wants to tap Claude Allegre to lead the country's new ministry of industry and innovation. Twenty years ago Mr. Allegre was among the first to trill about man-made global warming, but the geochemist has since recanted. New Zealand last year elected a new government, which immediately suspended the country's weeks-old cap-and-trade program.

The number of skeptics, far from shrinking, is swelling. Oklahoma Sen. Jim Inhofe now counts more than 700 scientists who disagree with the U.N. -- 13 times the number who authored the U.N.'s 2007 climate summary for policymakers. Joanne Simpson, the world's first woman to receive a Ph.D. in meteorology, expressed relief upon her retirement last year that she was finally free to speak "frankly" of her nonbelief. Dr. Kiminori Itoh, a Japanese environmental physical chemist who contributed to a U.N. climate report, dubs man-made warming "the worst scientific scandal in history." Norway's Ivar Giaever, Nobel Prize winner for physics, decries it as the "new religion." A group of 54 noted physicists, led by Princeton's Will Happer, is demanding the American Physical Society revise its position that the science is settled. (Both Nature and Science magazines have refused to run the physicists' open letter.) Read the whole article at WSJ.

Scientists Standing up to the Gore Scam

I found a some interesting websites that are standing up against Al Gore's invented Climate Change caused by CO2 scam. More and more people are realizing that this scam is making Gore a rich man. As Friendsofscience.org states: "It is our opinion that the Sun is the main direct and indirect driver of climate change." The above graph at friendsofscience.org shows that in fact temperatures have fallen since 2002.

The International Climate Scientific Coalition (ICSC) "is an international association of scientists, economists and energy and policy experts working to promote better public understanding of climate change science and policy worldwide. ICSC is committed to providing a highly credible alternative to the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) thereby fostering a more rational, open discussion about climate issues."

Core Principles of International Climate Science Coalition (ICSC)

1. Global climate is always changing in accordance with natural causes and recent changes are not unusual.

2. Science is rapidly evolving away from the view that humanity's emissions of carbon dioxide and other 'greenhouse gases' are a cause of dangerous climate change.

3. Climate models used by the IPCC* fail to reproduce known past climates without manipulation and therefore lack the scientific integrity needed for use in climate prediction and related policy decision-making.

4. The UN IPCC Summary for Policymakers and the assertions of IPCC executives too often seriously mis-represent the conclusions of their own scientific reports.

5. Claims that ‘consensus’ exists among climate experts regarding the causes of the modest warming of the past century are contradicted by thousands of independent scientists.

6. Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant - it is a necessary reactant in plant photosynthesis and so is essential for life on Earth.

7. Research that identifies the Sun as the principal driver of global climate must be taken more seriously.

8. Global cooling has presented serious problems for human society and the environment throughout history while global warming has generally been highly beneficial.

9. It is not possible to reliably predict how climate will change in the future, beyond the certainty that multi-decadal warming and cooling trends, and abrupt changes, will all continue, underscoring a need for effective adaptation.

10. Since science and observation have failed to substantiate the human-caused climate change hypothesis, it is premature to damage national economies with `carbon' taxes, emissions trading or other schemes to control 'greenhouse gas' emissions.
* United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)

Also go to http://icecap.us/index.php/go/faqs-and-myths#2 to see answers to the myths regarding "global warming".

Global Warming: Another Way to Put Money down the Sewer

Will Al Gore continue on with his Global Warming Church in the face of our economic meltdown? Well, there are more and more scientists finding courage to come out now with the charge that what the Goracle is claiming is in fact a lie and what he is doing is manipulating the data. Watch this video by the Heartland Institute.