The Scam of Global Warming Is Out - Finally!

It has finally happened! The truth of so called "Climate Change" has shown it's true face and it is very ugly. The story is coming out that these climate scientists had data opposing their so called evidence of human caused climate change. What did they do with this data? Did they look at the data without bias and as any scientist should look at data - by looking at the evidence with reason and truth? No, they tried to hide it because it opposed their ideology. This is a blow to the integrity of scientists and science all over the world.

Phil Jones, the center of the "climate change" meltdown should resign or be fired for the fraud that he is. Go to this two link to read more.

Climate scientist at centre of leaked email row dismisses conspiracy claims
Phil Jones of the University of East Anglia denies emails provide evidence of collusion by climatologists to fix data

Then you have a writer for Guardian.co.uk, George Monbiot, writing as if the leaked emails were just innocent email exchanges and not the hiding of data that it really was. Instead he accuses the people who demanded data proving that there was manmade global warming to show the DATA!! (READ at Guardian).

...It is true that much of what has been revealed could be explained as the usual cut and thrust of the peer review process, exacerbated by the extraordinary pressure the scientists were facing from a denial industry determined to crush them. One of the most damaging emails was sent by the head of the climatic research unit, Phil Jones. He wrote "I can't see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow - even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!"...

...The handling of this crisis suggests that nothing has been learnt by climate scientists in this country from 20 years of assaults on their discipline. They appear to have no idea what they're up against or how to confront it. Their opponents might be scumbags, but their media strategy is exemplary.

Even the New York Times writes about the "tricks" these climate warming scientists use to fudge the data:

In a 1999 e-mail exchange about charts showing climate patterns over the last two millenniums, Phil Jones, a longtime climate researcher at the East Anglia Climate Research Unit, said he had used a “trick” employed by another scientist, Michael Mann, to “hide the decline” in temperatures.

Dr. Mann, a professor at Pennsylvania State University, confirmed in an interview that the e-mail message was real. He said the choice of words by his colleague was poor but noted that scientists often used the word “trick” to refer to a good way to solve a problem, “and not something secret.” (Read at New York Times).